In This Issue
- When Should One Use Viable, Non-viable or Both Sampling Methods?
|
|
|
What's New?
To provide you with quality information Monday through Friday, we are testing a WEBLOG. The WEBLOG is updated daily with information you may find useful.
Please visit the WEBLOG and give us your feedback.
|
|
|
|
Sampling Tips
Learn which samples to take and the analytical methods to use at Collecting and Sending Samples to a Laboratory. |
|
|
|
| Training Seminars: Schedule Update! Check out our next training seminars at Current Training. In these seminars we discuss how to recognize mould, sampling, types of samples and when to take them, and how to interpret laboratory results. Register today for the July 5, 2005 Training Seminar.
Register for the seminar here.
|
|
|
|
Special Offer
Send 5 or more samples of spore traps (non-viable) or bulk or tape and save money! For details click special offer. Remember, as an added value to our analytical services, we help the client with data interpretation and also provide relevant technical information for identified dominant moulds at no extra cost. |
|
|
|
What's
Ahead?
The Truth About Stachybotrys chartarum . Don't Miss this one. |
|
|
|
| Contact
Us Please feel
free to forward this issue to friends and associates. Anyone can subscribe for free:
subscribe instructions here
To contact us:
Mold & Bacteria Consulting Laboratories (MBL) Inc.
1020 Brevik Place, Unit 1A
Mississauga, ON L4W 4N7.
info@moldbacteria.com
(905)290-9101
|
|
|
|
Sampling For Airborne Mould Spores: When Should One Use Viable, Non-viable Or Both Methods?
|
|
An air quality investigation may require determining airborne mould (spores and hyphal fragments) concentration. Air can either be sampled onto some growth media for culture analysis or on a sticky surface or a filter membrane for direct microscopic examination. It is sometimes debated as to whether one should take non-viable samples, viable samples or a combination of the two. Either method can be used without the other or both can be used together (at the same time) depending on the objectives of the investigation.
Due to lack of standardization some terminologies used in air sampling are technically incorrect or misleading. Let's discuss these terms first.
Non-viable Air Samples
"Non-viable air samples" refer to samples that are taken on some sticky media or on a filter membrane or tape and subsequently examined directly under a microscope for enumeration and identification of mould spores and hyphal fragments without culturing. In other words, the samples are taken for analyses by direct microscopic examination (DME). Results are presented as a listing of various categories of moulds and the corresponding number of spores or hyphal fragments per cubic meter of air (Spores/m3). This term is technically inaccurate since viable and non-viable propagules are indistinguishable under the microscope and hence both are enumerated.
Viable Air Samples
"Viable air samples" refer to samples that are taken on some growth media and subsequently incubated for mould propagules (spores and/or hyphal fragments) to germinate and form colonies. The resulting colonies are then enumerated and/or transferred to other media for identification to genus or species. Results are presented as a listing of the recovered moulds and their corresponding number of colony forming units per cubic meter of air (CFU/m3). That is, the analysis of viable air samples involves culturing. The term is also technically inaccurate because some (sometimes most) of the propagules impacted on the growth media may not germinate not because they are not viable but because of the selectivity of the growth media used, competition from fast growing moulds or that some moulds can only grow on living hosts.
Spore traps
"Spore traps" is commonly used to refer to non-viable air samples. However, whether sampling is done for culture analysis with an RCS, Andersen or for DME with Air-O-Cell or other similar cassettes it involves spore trapping. "Spore traps" is therefore applicable to both viable and non-viable samples.
When should one use viable, non-viable or both sampling methods?
The easiest way to decide on this is first to define the objectives of air sampling, data required from sample analysis and the questions these data are meant to answer. The objective might be broad or very specific.
- When to use non-viable sampling
If the objective of air sampling was to have an idea of how contaminated the air is, then the data required would be total counts. Non-viable samples would then be the best to take because counting includes both those propagules that can grow on laboratory media and those which cannot grow either because they are dead or would not grow on the selected media. Non-viable sampling may also be selected when the objective of air sampling is to determine the total counts for airborne spores prior to and after remediation to assess the effectiveness of remediation. In this case viable air samples would not be necessary.
- When to use viable sampling
If the objective of air sampling was to find whether the air contains a specific species of mould e.g., Aspergillus fumigatus, then identification to species would be required. Since non-viable analysis would not distinguish A. fumigatus from other Aspergillus species and not even from Penicillium species and related genera, then sampling for viable analysis would be selected. For detecting a specific species, a selective media that would support the growth of the mould of interest would also be selected. If identification to species was required for a broad range of moulds, then media that support growth of a wide range of moulds would be selected.
- When to use both non-viable and viable sampling
If the objective of air sampling was to determine the total airborne mould concentration and at the same time determine the proportion of viable propagules, then both sampling methods would be used. This would possibly be the case in hospitals where concern is not only the total concentration of airborne mould but also the viable species present.
Conclusion
These are not the only reasons why one may sample for non-viable, viable or both non-viable and viable analysis. It all depends on the objectives of air sampling, the data required and the questions these data are intended to answer.
To see the guidelines for interpreting non-viable air sample results click Guidelines for Interpreting Non-viable Air Samples. To see guideliness for interpreting viable air sample results, click Guidelines for Interpreting Viable Air Samples. To get hands-on experience on the application of these guidelines register for our Mould Training Seminars today!
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Dr. Jackson Kung’u is a Microbiologist who has specialised in the field of mycology (the study of moulds and yeasts). He is a member of the Mycological Society of America. He graduated from the University of Kent at Canterbury, UK, with a Masters degree in Fungal Technology and a PhD in Microbiology. He has published several research papers in international scientific journals. Jackson has analysed thousands of mould samples from across Canada. Before joining MBL, Jackson was the Principal Mycologist for Pinchin Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, which he helped to establish and obtain AIHA accreditation. Jackson provides how-to advice on indoor mould and bacteria issues. Get more information about indoor mould and bacteria at http://www.moldbacteria.com.
Become a subscriber - FREE- for original reviews on mould and bacteria issues.
|
|
